Key Terms

• Short-selling institutions: Institutions that profit by short-selling stocks and buying them back when the stock price drops.
• Adani Group: One of India's largest business conglomerates, recently accused of financial fraud by short-selling institutions.
• Hindenburg Research: A short-selling institution that exposes corporate issues through negative reports.
• Super Bowl ads: Ads during the annual NFL championship game in the United States. They are extremely expensive and serve as an important platform for brand marketing.
• Temu: A cross - border e - commerce platform under Pinduoduo, which has rapidly expanded in the US market through extensive advertising.

---

Abstract

In early 2023, Gautam Adani, the richest man in India, was challenged by short - selling institution Hindenburg Research, attracting global attention. Hindenburg accused the Adani Group of stock manipulation and financial fraud, causing the market value of its affiliated companies to evaporate by over $100 billion. Meanwhile, the cost of Super Bowl ads in the US reached a new high. Pinduoduo's overseas platform, Temu, spent a fortune on these ads, demonstrating the ambition of Chinese enterprises to enter overseas markets. Additionally, Dingdong Maicai announced its first full - scale profit, marking a new stage in the development of the fresh food e - commerce industry. This issue of Vibrant Morning Coffee delves deep into the short - selling mechanism, analyzes its operation mode and potential risks, and explores its impact on the market.

---

Insights

This content thoroughly analyzes the operation mode of the short - selling mechanism, revealing its double - edged effect in the market. On the one hand, short - selling institutions help purify the market environment by exposing issues such as financial fraud. On the other hand, their actions may also trigger market panic and even cause damage to innocent enterprises. Moreover, the program also focuses on the active expansion of Chinese enterprises in overseas markets and the exploration of profit models in the fresh food e - commerce industry, reflecting the new trends in current economic development.

---

Views

01 "Short - selling is a double - edged sword"

Short - selling institutions profit by exposing problems of listed companies. To some extent, they can play a role in market supervision, but at the same time, they may also trigger market turmoil and cause unnecessary damage to the shorted companies.

02 "Chinese enterprises are actively expanding overseas markets"

Temu, under Pinduoduo, spent a large amount of money on Super Bowl ads, indicating that Chinese enterprises are actively expanding overseas markets and trying to enhance their international influence through brand marketing.

03 "The profit model of fresh food e - commerce is gradually becoming clear"

Dingdong Maicai's first announcement of full - scale profit shows that the fresh food e - commerce industry is gradually getting out of the loss dilemma and exploring a sustainable profit model.

---

In - depth Analysis

Short - selling Institutions: Market Scavengers or Vultures? In - depth Thoughts Triggered by the Adani Incident

In early 2023, a "hunt" initiated by short - selling institution Hindenburg Research pushed Gautam Adani, the richest man in India, into the spotlight. Hindenburg released a long report accusing the Adani Group of stock manipulation, financial fraud, and excessive debt. This triggered market panic, causing the market value of Adani's affiliated companies to evaporate by over $100 billion in just three weeks, equivalent to the size of Meituan or Pinduoduo. This incident not only caused a huge shock in the financial market but also led to profound thinking about the nature, role, and impact of short - selling institutions.

Short - selling: A High - risk, High - reward Game

Short - selling refers to the trading behavior where investors expect a certain stock to decline in the future. They borrow and sell the stock, then buy it back and return it when the price drops, earning the price difference. For those who follow Chinese Internet listed companies, short - selling is not an unfamiliar concept. Well - known companies such as Luckin Coffee, iQiyi, New Oriental, 360, and Evergrande have all been targets of short - selling institutions.

The profit model of short - selling institutions may seem simple, but it actually involves huge risks. First, short - selling institutions need to invest a large amount of time and effort in research to find companies with problems. This requires professional financial analysis skills, in - depth industry insights, and sufficient human and material resources. Take Luckin Coffee as an example. To understand Luckin's real operating conditions, short - selling institution Muddy Waters Research hired tens of thousands of people to record the footfall in thousands of Luckin coffee stores in dozens of cities across the country and collected more than 25,000 shopping receipts.

Second, short - selling institutions need to choose the right time to enter the stock market and release short - selling reports. The content of the reports must be detailed and reliable, capable of convincing other investors and triggering market doubts and selling of the target company. In addition, short - selling institutions can also cooperate with brokerage media to release negative comments, report to regulatory authorities, or affect the target company's financing channels to create an illusion of a financial crisis.

Finally, short - selling institutions need to buy back and return the stocks after the price drops to earn the price difference. However, if the short - selling institution makes a wrong judgment or the market experiences unexpected situations, causing the stock price to rise, the short - selling institution will face huge losses. Compared with going long, the profit margin of short - selling is limited, but the losses are unlimited.

The Adani Incident: A Carefully Planned "Hunt"

Hindenburg Research's short - selling of the Adani Group was undoubtedly a carefully planned "hunt." Hindenburg pointed out in the report that the Adani Group had problems such as stock manipulation, financial fraud, and excessive debt and listed a large amount of evidence. After the report was released, the market's confidence in the Adani Group was severely damaged, and the stock price continued to fall.

Although the Adani Group issued a more than 400 - page response, comprehensively denying Hindenburg Research's accusations, it failed to reverse the decline. Investors sold off Adani Group's stocks one after another, resulting in a significant shrinkage of its market value. This short - selling battle not only affected the reputation and financial situation of the Adani Group but also had a certain impact on the Indian stock market and economy.

Short - selling Institutions: Market Scavengers or Vultures?

The existence of short - selling institutions has sparked disputes about their nature and role. Some people believe that short - selling institutions are market scavengers. By exposing problems such as financial fraud, they help purify the market environment and protect the interests of investors. Others think that short - selling institutions are vultures. They profit through malicious short - selling and may even cause damage to innocent enterprises.

Undoubtedly, short - selling institutions can play a role in market supervision to some extent. Through in - depth research, they can discover problems in listed companies and make them public, thereby prompting listed companies to strengthen internal management and improve the transparency of information disclosure. However, the actions of short - selling institutions may also trigger market panic and even cause damage to innocent enterprises. Some short - selling institutions may exaggerate facts, release false information, or conduct insider trading to pursue profits, thus undermining the fairness and justice of the market.

Forward - looking Thinking: How to Regulate Short - selling Behavior?

Facing the double - edged effect of short - selling institutions, how to regulate their behavior so that they can better serve the market has become an important issue.

First, it is necessary to strengthen the supervision of short - selling institutions and improve the transparency of their information disclosure. Short - selling institutions should disclose their short - selling strategies, positions, and investigation reports so that investors can better understand their actions and make rational judgments.

Second, it is necessary to improve laws and regulations and severely crack down on malicious short - selling behavior. Those who exaggerate facts, release false information, or conduct insider trading should be held legally accountable to maintain the fairness and justice of the market.

Finally, it is necessary to strengthen investor education and improve investors' risk awareness. Investors should view the actions of short - selling institutions rationally, not blindly follow the trend, and make wise investment decisions based on their own risk tolerance.

In conclusion, short - selling institutions are a double - edged sword. They can play a role in market supervision but may also trigger market turmoil. Only by strengthening supervision, improving laws and regulations, and enhancing investor education can they better serve the market and promote the healthy development of the capital market.